wmt

In the margins of Barron's this week there was a smallish note about the government of Venezuela nationalizing Cemex's (NYSE: CX) operations in that country. For some reason the government of Hugo Chavez thinks that stealing all of the private companies in 'his' country will lead to greater prosperity for 'his' people.

While it is a long journey from Venezuela to Zimbabwe, with its exponential inflation rate and a near-total economic breakdown, every journey begins with a first step. Mr. Chavez will move much closer to this inevitable outcome if he continues on his chosen path.

Motley Fool has a good write-up on the subject in which they detail the sour relations between Chavez and foreign businesses. Chavez recently offered to re-open negotiations with Cemex, but since he has already decided to take the company, that offer is suspect -- you can't negotiate with a gun pointing at you. To date, Chavez has nationalized the telecommunications industry, electricity, and oil. How many steps down the road is that? Why would anyone want to invest in Venezuela?

Since several banks have been taken over by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), many depositors who had limited their accounts to the $100,000 guarantee have been taken by surprise to find the funds are not immediately available for withdrawal, sometimes only learning that fact after waiting hours in line.

It is a peculiarity of government to sometimes punish the innocent with a very logical bureaucratic nuance. In this case, depositors should be aware the FDIC will indeed make good on its promise. The problem is that all accounts with more than $100,000 are frozen until they can sort out who is due what.

Since a $100,000 account can become larger due to collected interest, access to money is held up even if the overage is by a small amount. However, if the account is smaller, then there is no question and the money can be released.

So although funds are not at risk in the long run, in the short run, access may be restricted. Therefore, you may find it safer to keep $99,000 in your account than $100,000, or you should have all the interest automatically deposited in another account so you do not go over the limit.

All of this is not material except in the most extreme of circumstances. On the other hand, that is when a delay in access to your funds is also the most critical.

Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture & planning firm. He writes the columns Chasing Value and Serious Money.

'Tis the election season of 2008 and any industry in a mess has exactly two months to make its case and claims to a beneficent US Congress. Who, after all, wants to harm or neglect the already struggling US auto industry.? With General Motors (NYSE: GM) and Ford (NYSE: F) having reached their lowest market valuation in more than a generation, why not ask for the bailout...ah, sorry, assistance...ah, sorry again...low interest loans to re-tool their respective factories for future fuel efficient vehicles.

What's the deal here? The energy bill from 2007 allows for low interest loans to create next generation technologies for energy efficiency. The auto makers want to press Congress hard for their share when the summer recess is over...and certainly before the election. The auto makers say they need $50 billion to be competitive again.The rub as some see it is the desire of the auto makers asking for twice the amount that has been earmarked for such projects. Why not, asking for twice the amount right now is opportunistic as politicians are running for re-election and want to hang their hats on any good issue that will save jobs and create goodwill.

Every trade publication made mention this week that Huaneng Power International, (ADR) (NYSE: HNP), following the decision by China's National Development and Reform Commission to lift power price tariffs, said it's increased prices by 5.67% in a move effective Aug. 20.

The stock is down from $41.75 in December when I suggested adding it to your watch list, to about $35 ten weeks ago when I last wrote at length about it in Chasing Value: You want power, buy power -- Huaneng Power HNP. It closed today at $28.36, up $0.31 (+1.11%) and is paying a 5.78% dividend yield.

The Motley Fools recently reported that the Chinese goverment will be increasing their efforts to clean up the environment. Along those lines Huaneng Power is in the procees of building the first zero-emissions coal-fired power plant. HNP also announced that it is raising generating capacity to 36,993 MW.

HNP remains one of my favorites for the next few decades as China continues to develop. As long as the dividend remains secure it is a very compelling stock to include in a long term diversified portfolio as a core holding.

Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture & planning firm. He writes the columns Chasing Value and Serious Money. DISCLOSURE: I currently own shares of HNP.

My very first post on bloggingstocks was Microsoft: What are you thinking about? where I ranted that Microsoft Inc. (NASDAQ: MSFT) stock was going nowhere. Over the last 29, months that is exactly what it has done. It closed yesterday at $27.62.

This is not to say it has not had it's moments rising at one time to a 52-week high of $37.50 on a lot of hopes and prayers. Nevertheless, I felt then and do now that MSFT would be better off in pieces Micro'soft' vs Micro'hard' -- Break it up fellas!

If Microsoft wants to compete against Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) and be a dominant player on the web, it should split out its web services as a separate company. That new company would be the right merger partner for Yahoo! (NASDAQ: YHOO). There is no reason to tie the web services business to the future of the Zune (if it has one) or the XBOX entertainment game player and other equally unrelated business.

The first major economic act of presidential hopeful Barack Obama will be to add Hillary Clinton to the lower half of the democratic ticket. If he does not, he will be throwing caution to the wind.

All indications are that he does not want to do this and hopes he will not have to -- but he may not have any choice.

It is just good business and if he is too stubborn, too arrogant, or just misguided by favorable polling numbers, he should think again. There are many Hillary supporters who will find McCain more centrist than Obama and switch parties. There will be very few, if any, to the right of McCain who will vote for Obama. They are more likely to not vote than support Obama.

Adding Hillary Clinton, in most people's eyes, will slam dunk the presidential race and if Obama does not make this tough decision, putting success in front of politics and personalities, then I am afraid all his talk of being able to stand up to special interests and take the heat in the kitchen is just that.

The stock market was down yesterday and it is down again today. Bearish sentiment is roaming through Wall Street right now, so I thought I would look back on another occasion when the market was going through similar turmoil and I wrote about the following eight stocks, which I thought would be "safe havens" in such a storm.

Six of the eight did well and two did not, and of course one of those two was a disaster. Among the losers, I do not think anyone is fretting about UPS, which is still one of the few triple-A rated companies along with Berkshire Hathaway. It has been well reported that the slowing economy and higher fuel prices have been the major culprits affecting UPS's earnings. In the case of WaMu, it's demise has also been well reported, but at the time I recommended it WaMu had a stellar reputation of growth and high yield for over two decades. There is no hiding, it turned out to be a lousy pick and an ANTI-SAFE Haven

NOT SAFE:

United Parcel Service (NYSE: UPS) closed Monday at $65.30 down from $78.40; a 16.71% loss

Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM) closed Monday at $4.21 down from $45.50; a 98% loss.

Fortunately the remaining six picks have done very, very well. If you had bought the pool, the average gain over the last two years would have been 7.14%. Adding the dividends over the two years would have raised this to 13.14%.

While vultures continue to circle around the body of consumer electronics retailer Circuit City Stores, Inc. (NYSE: CC), the company is at least trying to look alive even though much of the world has left it for dead. Circuit City's latest travail is offering "back to school tips" to concerned parents, who, after reading Circuit City's tips-as-a-marketing-press-release, must think the retailer is on its last leg.

Apparently, many retailers believe the majority of the American public are seasonal procrastinators. The "rush to back to school" is not really a rush more than a shopping highlight for many retailers from apparel to computers to shoes to notebooks (the paper kind).

Circuit City's latest effort states some statistics as a lead-in for customers to come into their local Circuit City and shop for PCs and all the related garb that goes with them. As in, printers and ink and thumb drives ... oh my.

Circuit City's parting shot in its "back to school" montage was the mentioning of a gift card. In fact, you can email a gift card from your PC to your college student! Wow, how 2001-ish! I'm just confused on why Circuit City even participated in a "duh" survey like this to drum up a rather lackluster press release from a company that couldn't manage itself out of a shoebox.

Reporting on the daily appreciation of MBIA Inc. (NYSE: MBI) over the last few weeks has made me feel like a play-by-play announcer. One comment in an earlier post on MBIA raked me over the coals for writing when the stock was up 26%, only a few days after I suggested readers take a look at some crushed financials in Serious Money: Tempting fate with 10 financials. He did this even though on the day he commented it was up by 74%.

I was just reporting the jump but the reader took me to task for bragging when nothing should be judged so quickly, and my previous financial calls were bad. Well, MBIA has now leaped from $4.92 three weeks ago to $11.22 at Friday's close for a gain of 126%. This is BIG news even if it happened quickly -- in particular because it happened quickly.

The reasons may be numerous. Perhaps it is a combination of company stock buybacks and short covering. Perhaps it is the periodic comments in Barron's about the value of the company based on its current book of business and the fact it needs no new business to be profitable. In its last earnings report, MBIA did suprise to the upside substantially. Last Friday was certainly related to the fact that it was taken off the watch-list for the next three months as the ratings agencies supported MBIA's rating of AA.

MBIA has a current price-to-book of 0.26, a P/S ratio of 0.76 and P/CF of 1.57, so maybe it is still worth a look.

Update: Final, closed up to $11.83, $0.61, (+ 5.44%). MBIA stands at $140% gain.

Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture & planning firm. He writes the columns Chasing Value and Serious Money. Disclosure: I own shares of MBI.

Well, the market was in the dumps yesterday and is even worse today. So this may be a good time to check on my list of stocks for those looking for equities that are stable enough to ride out this bearish storm.

This update is a spot-check of my earlier post Serious Money: Five stable stocks for troubled times, to see how my picks are holding up so far. Closing prices are for August 12, 2008.

The standard for comparison will be the Standard & Poor's 500 Index, which closed on June 30, 2008 at 1,280.00. The following are the five stocks with closing prices from July 1.

1) Johnson and Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) -- when recommended the stock closed at $64.34 and paid a 2.89% dividend yield. It finished at $71.70 -- up 11.44%

2) Teva Pharmaceuticals ADR (NASDAQ: TEVA) -- when recommended the stock closed at $45.80 and paid a 1% dividend yield. It finished at $46.41-- up 1.3%.

3) Chubb Corp. (NYSE: CB) -- when recommended the stock closed at $49.01 and paid a 2.64% dividend yield. It finished at $48.39 -- down 1.26%.

After a rather nasty stock slide in earnings, share price and reputation MBIA Inc. (NYSE: MBI), the holding company for MBIA Insurance, has finally reported good news for its depressed investors; for the second quarter of 2008 the company's net income was $1.7 billion, or $7.14 per share, an improvement, compared with $211.8 million, or $1.61 per share for the corresponding period of 2007(see more earnings news).

MBIA is generating revenue from existing business but new business has been harder to come by since Moody's and Standard & Poors both downgraded the company from a financial rating of AAA to AA.

Since I recommended the stock on July 29, 2008 it is up 74% rising from $4.92 to the close last Friday of $8.57. It is trading mid-day at $8.80. I will update after todays close.

In other news the company has also announced a law suit against Bill Ackman who shorted the stock and made many public claims that MBIA was destined to become insolvent. MBIA (MBI) And Ackman: Killing The Messenger.

Republican presidential nominee-in-waiting, John McCain is going to be all smiles as we approach the November election. If you are a conspiracy theorist, or just find it a curious irony as I do, you must be noting that, just this week, the Federal Reserve decided to leave the Fed loan rate at 2%, the Iraq and U.S. governments are negotiating a withdrawal timetable for our troops, and oil prices are falling fast.

All of these headline-worthy items will benefit the Republicans more than the Democrats. Furthermore, all of these improvements will help the folks on Wall Street and Main Street. The stock market is way up today, they say on dropping oil prices: Stocks jump as oil prices fall sharply.

This has the taint of political engineering or "electioneering," even if it is just coincidence. Maybe the world is just happy to see Dubya go into retirement ... who knows?

Earlier I posted Obama's $1000 giveaway is a take away! and now it's time to rant about Dear John. He is on record as claiming he can balance the federal budget by the end of his first term without raising taxes. I think we have heard that before. It's not going to happen. Why do politicians insist on uttering such nonsense?

If Barack Obama is receiving advice from "my pal Warren" then he must not be listening. There is no way that Warren Buffett, the national debt hawk, would support Obama's stupid idea of giving another $1,000 back to every family in America. It is reported that he would pay for this by creating a windfall profit tax on oil companies.

This give-away program is an attempt to buy votes plain and simple. It would add to the national debt, discourage oil companies from investing and worse it would handicap American companies more than others and mortgage more of our children's futures.

The last thing the people of the United States need is more deficit spending. If we did tax oil companies, which I am against, I would only support using the funds for expanding education, research and development in science and engineering with the goal of maintaining our waning leadership in technology.

In a conversation with an attorney friend of mine, who happens to be a woman, she asked for some general financial guidance. During the course of the conversation it occurred to me that women need to save more than men. There are many reasons for this, here are a few:

The first and most obvious reason women need to save more than men is that they live longer -- often without the support of a significant other. Living longer and living alone cost more money.

Second of all, women still do not have complete earnings parity with men. Some of this has to do with job type and some with history. But nevertheless, we are not there yet. If there is a 15% disparity, then a woman is starting at a disadvantage whether saving for her retirement in the future or for buying a gallon of gas today. This can only be made up by saving more and investing more. This is a worthy goal except that with less resources the difficulty is exacerbated.

I don't usually get peeved by misleading headlines, but given the amount of attention Fortune magazine's "Falling oil prices: The downside" by Colin Barr has been receiving -- see Slate's Beware of cheap oil for an example -- I felt compelled to comment.

If you haven't read the article, here's the tag line: "Lower prices mean less pain at the pump -- but tougher times ahead for the economy." And here's the main point:

But falling oil prices also suggest that the recession the U.S. has so far avoided is well on its way, as consumers pull back from the spending spree that drove economic growth earlier this decade. A weakening economy will mean more layoffs, further pressuring already reduced spending.

Two beefs I have with the above: First, anyone suggesting the U.S. has avoided a recession so far is playing with semantics. The second and main beef is that lower oil prices didn't cause, and will not cause, the economy to slow down. Rather, the slowing economy has caused oil prices to drop. Lower oil prices only reflect the state of the economy.